Project-Based Learning in Engineering Cornerstone and Core Courses
Wednesday, October 10, 2012 – ( 3:00 pm to 4:00 pm )

Location: Babbio 320, Stevens Institute of Technology
Dr. Stephanie Farrell
Associate Professor of Chemical Engineering
Rowan University
ABSTRACT
Project-based learning is a learner-centered, constructivist approach to teaching which
offers several advantages over traditional classroom methods. Problem-based learning
(PBL) has been shown to result in better content knowledge, problem solving ability,
metacognitive skills and attitude toward learning [1]. In addition, PBL results in
enhanced communication and teamwork skills, understanding of professional practice,
and ability to apply learning to solve problems [2]. PBL is currently the most popular
pedagogy for teaching design and has also been widely used for first-year cornerstone
courses [3]. Descriptions of PBL in Chemical Engineering core courses are relatively
scarce in the literature. Practically speaking, making the transition to PBL from more
traditional classroom approaches is daunting and unlikely to be accomplished in a single
step. Two models for project-based learning will be described based on the author’s
personal experience teaching Freshman Engineering Clinic and Chemical Reaction
Engineering. The Freshman Engineering model involves a guided approach and is
appropriate for multidisciplinary cornerstone design because it gives students exposure to
a wide variety of engineering topics. A large semester-long design project is integrated
into the Chemical Reaction Engineering course, and its specific role in the course evolved
over several years, moving towards the PBL approach in a stepwise manner. This
stepwise implementation can be mirrored with other projects in other courses.
1. Thomas, J.W., “A review of research on Project-based Learning,” San Rafael, CA:
Autodesk Foundation, 2000.
2. Mills, J.E., and Treagust, D.F., “Engineering Education—Is Problem-Based or Project-
Based Learning the Answer?” Austraaslian Journal of Engineering Education,
http://www.aaee.com.au/journal/2003/mills_treagust03.pdf.
3. Dym, C., Agogino, A., Eris, O., Frey, D., and Leifer, L., “Engineering Design
Thinking, Teaching, and Learning,” Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 94, No. 1,
2005, pp. 103–120.
BIOGRAPHY
Dr. Stephanie Farrell is an Associate Professor of Chemical Engineering at Rowan
University (USA). She obtained her PhD in Chemical Engineering from New Jersey
Institute of Technology in 1996 and her MS in Chemical Engineering from Stevens in
1992. Prior to joining the faculty at Rowan in 1998, she was an Assistant Professor of
Chemical Engineering and Adjunct Professor of Biomedical Engineering at Louisiana
Tech University until 1998. Dr. Farrell has made significant contributions to engineering
education through her work in experiential learning. She has been honored by the
American Society of Engineering Education with several teaching awards such as the
2004 National Outstanding Teaching Medal and the 2005 Quinn Award for experiential
learning. She has conducted workshops on a variety of topics including learner-centered
teaching, inductive teaching strategies and the use of experiments and demonstrations to
enhance learning. Dr. Farrell was selected as the 2010 National Effective Teaching
Institute Fellow and co-presented this 2.5 day workshop at the 2010 Annual ASEE
Conference.